Isolation and characterization of Lactobacillus species from sheep milk
Abhinandan Patil 1, 4-5,
John Disouza 1, 7, Archana Dhavalshankh 3, Chandrashekhar
Mote 6, Shivaji Pawar 1, 2
1 Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, D. Y. Patil University,
Kolhapur, (MS). India
2 Centre for Innovative and Applied Research, Anekant
Education Society, Baramati, (MS). India
3 Department
of Pharmacology, D.Y.P.M.C, Kolhapur (MS). India
4 Chate Group of Education, Kolhapur (MS). India
5 Life Inspiration social foundation, Kolhapur
(MS). India
6 Department of Veterinary
Pathology KNP College of Veternary Science, Shirwal, (MS), India
7 Tatyasaheb Kore College of Pharmacy,
Warananagar (MS). India
* Correspondence
author: Shivaji Pawar
Email:
shpawar1946@gmail.com
Abstract
The microbiota present
in the human gut plays an vital role in the maintaining the normal health of
the individual. These microbes are called as probiotics. Lactobacillus is the
one of the probiotics assisting the digestion of the food and assimilation of
the nutrition. The Lactobacillus are also found in the milk of milking animals.
The discovery and investigation of these microbes’ activities will help us to
understand the pharmacological activities exhibited by these microbes. The
basic techniques of isolation using the selective media and characterisation
studies will help to understand the nature of these microbes ex. Gram staining,
arginine hydrolysis test etc.
Keywords:
Lactobacillus, Probiotics, Milk, Gram staining.
1.
Introduction
The
use of the microbes as functional food has explored its use in medical science. Probiotics are discovered from
the different natural sources from time to time as the functional food [1–5,5]. Lactobacillus is found as the most preferred genera in this direction with its utility in the dairy and
allied sciences [6]. The most
difficult task to use these microbes as the functional food is studying the
growth parameters along with the genomic analysis. The common part observed in
the case of probiotics from the same genera are
its differences in physiological and biochemical characterizations [7].
Fig. 1 represents
the general plating method used for the isolation of lactic acid bacteria on
artificial Lactobacillus selective media by taking sheep milk samples.
Fig.1.
Isolation of the lactic acid bacteria on the a) NRCLA and b) MRS media from
sheep milk samples
1. Isolation of
lactic acid bacteria from sheep milk in selective media
180 milk samples were collected from the Indian
sheep’s breed from local places of Kolhapur, Sangli and Admapur areas of Maharashtra. The samples (50 ml) collected were
stored at 5 °C until use. For bacterial enumeration, milk samples (1 ml) were
kept at -78 °C in 15% glycerol before use. MRS (de Man, Rogosa & Sharpe)
and NRCLA (Neutral Red Chalk Lactose
Agar) broths and agar media Lactobacillus selective media were obtained as a
gift sample from the Siffin Pharma, Germany [8]. MRS media was
prepared by autoclaving 6.5 g MRS agar media in 100 ml distilled water, while
NRCLA media was prepared by taking 5.1 g NRCLA agar media in 100 ml distilled
water. The samples were inoculated on both MRS and NRCLA media by four quadrant
streaking method and were incubated for a
period of 48 h in a micro-aerophilic condition. After incubation, the
individual colonies found on the NRCLA
media were sub-cultured on MRS media and
transferred into sterile MRS broth mediums. The purification of individually selected colonies were again
carried out by the streak plate technique
with the serial dilution method [8]. The isolated
colonies were again kept at -78°C in 15% glycerol before use and were evaluated
for their biochemical analysis.
Table
1. MRS media composition
Sr.
no |
Media
ingredients |
g/l |
1 |
Proteose
peptone |
10.0 |
2 |
Beef
extract |
10.0 |
3 |
Yeast
extract |
5.0 |
4 |
Dextrose |
20.0 |
5 |
Polysorbate
80 |
1.0 |
6 |
Ammonium
citrate |
2.0 |
7 |
Sodium
acetate |
5.0 |
8 |
Magnesium
sulphate |
0.1 |
9 |
Manganese
sulphate |
0.05 |
10 |
Dipotassium
phosphate |
2.0 |
Agar
pH (25 oC) - 6.5 g/l (approximately) |
||
5.5
g/100ml distilled water at 15 lbs pressure (121 oC) |
Table
2. NRCLA media composition
Sr.
No |
Media
ingredient |
g/l |
1 |
Peptic digest of
animal tissue |
3.0 |
2 |
Beef extract |
3.0 |
3 |
Yeast extract |
3.0 |
4 |
Lactose |
10.0 |
5 |
Calcium carbonate |
15.0 |
6 |
Neutral red |
0.05 |
7 |
Agar |
15.0 |
pH adjusted
to 6.8 at 25°C |
Table
3. MRS broth composition
Sr.
no |
Media
ingredients |
g/l |
1. |
Peptone |
10.0 |
2. |
Lab-lemco
powder |
8.0 |
3. |
Yeast
extract |
4.0 |
4. |
Glucose |
20.0 |
5. |
Sorbitan
mono-oleate |
1.0
(ml) |
6. |
Tri-mmonium
citrate |
2.0 |
7. |
Sodium
acetate |
5.0 |
8. |
Magnesium
sulphate |
0.2 |
9. |
Manganese
sulphate |
0.05 |
10. |
Dipotassium
phosphate |
2.0 |
pH
(25 oC) - 6.5 g/l (approximately) |
||
5.2
g/100ml distilled water at 15 lbs pressure (121 oC) |
2
Conventional lab techniques for analysis
of LAB
a) Gram Staining
The
Gram staining of the isolates was determined by light microscopy using Gram
staining reagents. It is known that LABs are gram-positive [9]. This means
that these cultures will produce blue-violet color for Gram-positive bacteria
and vice-versa. The cultures were grown in MRS media at 37 °C for 24 h under
micro-aerophilic conditions. Fresh cultures were used for gram staining. After
incubation, the cultures were aseptically transferred into 1.5 ml of eppendorf
tubes and centrifuged for 3 min at 9000 rpm. The cells were resuspended in
sterile water by removing the supernatant. L.
acidophilus from NCIM was used as positive control and E. coli was used as the negative control.
b) Catalase test
Catalase is an enzyme released by the
microbes during the metabolic process. This enzyme act on hydrogen peroxide
breaking it into water and oxygen and producing the gas bubbles. The release of
the gas bubbles during the test indicates the presence of catalase enzyme.
2H2O2→ 2 H2O + O2 ------------------------------------------------
1 (Equation)
The catalase test was carried out on
the isolates to see their reactions to catalase. To do this, two methods can be
performed. 18 h incubated cultures of isolates were grown on MRS agar at room
temperature. Furthermore, for the catalase test fresh liquid cultures of LAB
were used in which 3% hydrogen peroxide solution was added to 1 ml of cultures [10].
c) Gas production from glucose
This test determines the hetero-fermentative
and homo-fermentative nature of the isolates by the release of CO2
production from glucose. The overnight 1% cultures of the isolates were
inoculated in MRS broths lacking citrate into the inverted Durham tubes. These cultures were further incubated
for 48 h at 37 °C. The production of the CO2 gas in Durham tubes
indicates the presence of the glucose [8,11].
d) Growth at different temperatures
This test uses the bromecresol purple as an indicator in the freshly prepared MRS
media. 50 μl overnight cultures of inoculum were added into 5 ml tube of
modified MRS media and incubated for 7 days at 20 °C, 30 °C, 40, and 50 °C.
During these incubation time, the change
of the color from purple to yellow of the cells at different temperatures were
observed [8,12]. L.acidophilus
from NCIM was used as a positive control.
e) Arginine hydrolysis test
The arginine MRS modified medium and the
Nessler reagent was used to view ammonia release from arginine. The freshly
prepared 1% culture of the isolates was added into the MRS of 5 ml tubes
containing 0.3% of L-arginine hydrochloride. The tubes were further incubated
for 18 hours at 37 °C. After incubation, 50 μl of cultures were observed
against the white background. 50 μl of
the Nessler reagent was pipetted into the cultures and the change in the color
was observed. The positive reaction was indicated by a bright orange color,
while the yellow color determines the negative reaction. For the negative
control, arginine free MRS was used [13].
Results and Discussion
1. Physiological and
biochemical identification of LAB
All
the isolates were subjected to Gram staining and they were examined under a light microscope (100X magnification). All the
strains show blue-purple color staining,
except E. coli which is used as a negative control reference. Hence all the
isolated strains are found Gram-positive
bacteria (Fig. 3.3. A-C), while E. coli
shows pink color as it is Gram-negative
bacteria (Fig. 3.3.D).
Fig.
2. Gram staining a) Sample A, b) Sample b, c) L. acidophilus (positive control) and d) E. coli (negative control) (100X)
The
isolated Lactobacillus were long and rod-shaped. Isolates were tested for catalase
activity. All isolates are catalase negative, as none of them given catalase
activity. All strains show no gas production hence are homo-fermentative in
nature (Fig. 3.4).
Fig.
3. Homofermentative nature observed in
case of all Lactobacillus strain by Durham
tube method
Another
criterion for the identification of the isolates was the study of growth
pattern at different temperatures. From the results of 7 days observation, all
of the isolates show maximum growth between 35 °C ~ 37 °C. However,
significantly very less growth is observed at 20 °C and 50 °C (Fig. 3.5).
Fig.
4. Stress heat tolerance of Lactobacillus
at various temperature
Arginine hydrolysis test was used as another step to
follow the identification procedure. The isolates which gave the bright orange
are found in producing ammonia from arginine. The yellow color indicated
negative arginine hydrolysis. According to this test, both isolated strains
produced ammonia from arginine.
References
[1] Abhinandan Patil, Shivaji Pawar, John Disouza. Granules of
unistrain lactobacillus as nutraceutical antioxidant agent 2017, 9(4).1594-99.
[2] Abhinandan Patil, Pawar S. Health
benefits of Probiotics by Antioxidant Activity: A review. Pharma Times
2018;50:1–3.
[3] Patil A, Shivaji Pawar, John Disouza.
Lactobacillus rhamnosus ARJD as a Functional Food with Potential Antioxidant
and Antibacterial Abilities 2019;3:1–8.
[4] Patil A, Disouza J, Pawar S. Evaluation
of Lactobacillus plantarum growth in milk of Indian buffalo breeds based on its
physico-chemical content. Buffalo Bull 2019;38:345–52.
[5] Patil A, Disouza J, Shivaji Pawar.
Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus plantarum with the cell adhesion
properties. J Glob Pharma Technol 2018;10:1–6.
[6] Asha, Gayathri D. Synergistic impact of
Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus plantarum and vincristine on
1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colorectal carcinogenesis in mice. Exp Ther Med
2012;3:1049–54. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2012.536.
[7] Patil AR, Shinde SS, Kakade PS, D’souza
JI. LactobacillusModel Moiety a New Era Dosage Form as Nutraceuticals and
Therapeutic Mediator. Biotechnol. Bioforensics, Springer, Singapore; 2015, p.
11–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-050-6_2.
[8] Patil A, Disouza J, Pawar S. Shelf life
stability of encapsulated lactic acid bacteria isolated from Sheep milk thrived
in different milk as natural media. Small Rumin Res 2019;170:19–25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.09.014.
[9] Patil A, Dubey A, Malla MA, Disouza J,
Pawar S, Alqarawi AA, et al. Complete Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus
plantarum Strain JDARSH, Isolated from Sheep Milk. Microbiol Resour Announc
2020;9. https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.01199-19.
[10] Chang J-H, Shim YY, Cha S-K, Reaney MJT,
Chee KM. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus KFRI342 on the development of
chemically induced precancerous growths in the rat colon. J Med Microbiol
2012;61:361–8. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.035154-0.
[11] Tian Y, Nichols RG, Roy P, Gui W, Smith
PB, Zhang J, et al. Prebiotic effects of white button mushroom ( Agaricus
bisporus ) feeding on succinate and intestinal gluconeogenesis in C57BL/6 mice.
J Funct Foods 2018;45:223–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2018.04.008.
[12] Endo A, Irisawa T, Futagawa-Endo Y, Takano
K, du Toit M, Okada S, et al. Characterization and emended description of
Lactobacillus kunkeei as a fructophilic lactic acid bacterium. Int J Syst Evol
Microbiol 2012;62:500–4. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.031054-0.
[13] Yadav R, Puniya AK, Shukla P. Probiotic
Properties of Lactobacillus plantarum RYPR1 from an Indigenous Fermented
Beverage Raabadi. Front Microbiol 2016;7:7:1683.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01683.
0 Comments